“Labour Slashed Crime!”

Labour didn’t cut crime. Labour slashed crime. But don’t take my word for it; take the word of Simon Reed, Vice Chair of the Police Federation of England and Wales, speaking at the Progress conference on Saturday.

It deserves repeating as the name of the event was “Crime, Law and Order: Can Labour win the argument again?” According to this official representative of our rank and file police officers, “You didn’t cut crime, you slashed crime. You have a proud record.”

My photo of Simon Reed and Yvette Cooper at the event

We are aware that we saw a fall in crime during our 13 year tenure of office. We’re also aware that our policies were responsible for that fall.

We created neighbourhood policing, which ended remoteness and addressed the causes of crime, by reconnecting our officers with the community. This provided a boost in intelligence, reassurance to neighbourhoods. It also created a recognition and system of remaking the built environment, to design-out crime.

We created a new law on Anti-Social behaviour, which identified persistent community disorder as being similar to harassment. This issue was previously considered to be impossible to legislate against and was tolerated as a low-level non priority, but once introduced, proved to be immensely popular, with a knock-on effect to more serious offending.

More controversially, we increased prison sentences, meaning that persistent offenders were removed from wrong-doing for a period. We ensured that the quality of education in prison was massively improved.
Hazel Blears reminded us that in the ‘80s Labour was on the side of the defendants, until we recognised that the victims of crime were our people, the working class, the vulnerable, the poor. That’s when we changed our attitude. The police were no longer seen as being the agents of the right.

Chair, Kevin McKeever with Hazel Blears, MP

Chair, Kevin McKeever with Hazel Blears, MP

Hazel also spoke about a fantastic social enterprise in Salford called B4box, a construction company which employs the long-term unemployed and people coming out of prison. Hazel promised that the business will be scaled up across the country before long.

Under Labour, The National Grid began employing young people directly from Feltham and other Young Offender Institutes. Their only stipulation was that their education much be sufficient to pass a driving test and that the governor recommends them. This program was studied by The Smith Institute on behalf of government minister David Lammy.

It has been slow to catch on, but is catching on. The company was motivated by the difficulty in hiring recruits. However, in today’s period of high youth employment, Hazel Blears announced that Morrison’s are now setting up a national scheme to employ people leaving prison.

Yvette Cooper pointed out that the Prime Minister has made no major speech on crime in a whole year of office. The Home Secretary has made no tangible policy on crime or justice.

Yvette says “We need to stand on the side of victims and communities. We need to involve communities in the fight against crime. “

My snap of Enver Solomon at the event

Enver Solomon, a left wing criminologist who is now at The Children’s Society, condemned the manner in which children are often demonised. He pointed out that all the data of reported crime demonstrates that there is no “youth crime wave”.

Simon Reed also made a representation on the deployment of police resources. He said that crime is mostly committed in parts of the country with a large population of young men aged 16-25. If the police were allowed to identify these area, then they could concentrate their resources where they are needed. However, he complained that there is no system to provide this information to the police.

It occurred to me that GP records of the numbers of drug addicts and alcoholics would also contribute to this useful future reform.

When questioned on whether he was suggesting that the police should be managed as a national force, Mr Reed responded that there are 43 forces with 43 management structures. “We’re losing officers across the country, but we’re keeping 43 management structures. If being more efficient in our management meant we would lose less of them, then we say do it.”

This is an interesting development because when Labour proposed this reform in office, we got a hostile response from senior police officers. As a representative of the rank and file, the Federation seem to be suggesting that they would support us if we proposed this reform in the future.

All in all, this positive and buzzing event made the title a little academic. “Crime, Law and Order: Can Labour win the argument again?” We never lost the argument. We are the party of law and order. The other lot are the party of cuts and little else.

As Simon Reed said, “You didn’t cut crime, you slashed crime. You have a proud record.”

In case I don’t get around to blogging about the really good speeches in the main hall, here’s the photos.

Caroline Flint

Cllr Nick Forbes, leader of Birmingham council

Mary Riddell

Deborah Mattinson, Britain Thinks

Ed Miliband

Deborah Mattinson, Mary Riddell

8 Responses to “Labour Slashed Crime!”

  1. Thus Spake Zarathustra says:

    Your photos could do with some noise reduction and sharpening. A camera like the Canon s95 with raw would be better but within limits you can do this on jpegs. If you can’t spring for Lightroom then Rawtherapee might be an adequate substitute.

    The latest version of Photoshop Elements also comes with tone curve adjustment.

    • dan says:

      It was shot on an old pocket point and click on full zoom hand held. I’ve got Lightroom but used Elements to adjust. The most you sharpen the more noise you get.

  2. Thus Spake Zarathustra says:

    I clocked it was compact camera when I checked the exif data.

    If you do croma noise reduction first you’re okay. You can just tweak or leave luminance noise alone most of the time. Sharpening comes afterwards otherwise you sharpen noise as you say. When you’ve done capture sharpening and other adjustments print sharpening is the final stage.

    My camera is nothing special. I’ve got a Canon G9 and shoot locked to f4.5 most of the time as that’s the sweetspot for sharpness. You’ve got an SLR as well haven’t you? One tip if you want to ensure consistency across a days shooting is to lock aperture.

    Some of your shots in an earlier weren’t bad. Better staging can help with composition and DOF is really hard with a smaller sensor in tight spots. A used Canon 1DS MKII would be a good buy.

  3. dan says:

    On Lightroom I’ve got Colour and Luminance. and then there’s cromatic aberation.
    I use Nikon normally.

  4. Thus Spake Zarathustra says:

    I’ve got Lightroom 3.4. Always do croma noise (colour) first. You can mostly get away with only a tweak to luminance.

    Chromatic aberration is just correcting for the rainbow effect of light splitting in the lens, and is usually worse where you’ve got a dark and bright edge.

    Sharpening comes further down the pipeline so if you do it last it will sharpen the denoised photo.

    I’ve also got a Macbeth colour chart for creating profiles. Haven’t bothered doing a custom lens distortion profile so downloaded one from Adobe via Photoshop CS5. (Does Elements do that?)

    Nikon is okay. I’m just not familiar with their range and don’t have any Nikon kit. They’ve probably got an equivalent full frame camera.

    If you’re loaded get a light meter. Sekonic are good.

    How was the event photography? Was it just an opportunistic thing or did they accommodate event photographers? It looked a bit cluttered and cramped. Do they even consider the value of photography before they hold them? How are incidental things like water bottles arranged to help composition and are speaking guests coached?

  5. Phil C. says:

    Good article!
    It deals very well with the subject, and the direct effects of Labour policies on crime.
    I also like your refutation of the event’s title (in my view, that title was mischievous by Progress).

    But perhaps it’d be wise to bear in mind the indirect effects, too, of govt policies. Here Labour deserves further credit.
    The evidence from various research studies worldwide seems to strongly suggest that the evenness v unevenness of distribution of wealth in a society is of key importance. The narrower the gap between top and bottom, the more calm, stable and tolerant the society is, with appropriately lower levels of crime.
    It could be argued that this country was more at ease with itself during the New Labour govt than it was during the 80s, partly because the Labour govt made efforts to slow down the widening of the wealth gap.
    It could further be argued that for any political party to claim to be serious about law and order, that party must be aware of the dangers in allowing a rapidly widening gap in wealth distribution.

  6. dan says:

    Thanks, Phil.

  7. Thus Spake Zarathustra says:

    Seven comments. Is that a record?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: